The mass of the electron is 1/1837th the mass of a neutron. Big deal, right? Actually it IS a big deal.
Suppose we call the difference between the two, which is (1837)^-1, B, and the fine structure constant, A, which equals to e^2~(137)^-1. Quoting from Barrow and Tipler's THE COSMIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE.
"Although the Exclusion Orinciple provides for the overall stability
of solid bodies it is not responsible for the comparitively fixed
properties of ions within solids. Consider a lattice of ions; it is more
realistic to think of the electrons moving through it as a sea amid the
islands of fixed irons within solids. Every iron behaves as an
independent harmonic oscillater with mass =~mN(mass of Neutron) and
vibrates with a frequency (designated as W). If an iron is displaced a
distance X from its equilibrium position that it will gain a potential
energy ~0.5mN W^2 X^2 which must become AaO^-1 when x is of order aO
since the bonds then break. For these ionic oscillations the mean-square
velocity is ~AmN(AmE)^3
"The Uncertainty Principle ensures that the momentum resisting
localization is ~
( The square root of (
"and so the nuclei are accurately and rigidly located in the solid. The
uncertainy in the position of the atom is ~B^1/4 of the inter-atomic
seperation. If ions tried to move further afield than this they would
push the electrons into such a small region that their momentum would
grow to resist localization and force them back. The dependence in the
above formula reveals the key role that B(the difference between the
mass of the electron and the neutron) plays in Nature. It ensures that
nuclei have well-defined, relatively invariant, locations. When a
substance is heated, the positional uncertainty of the irons rises. If
atoms stray ~aO from their locations their materials will melt or, if
molecules stray, disassociate. If one tried to build up ordered
materials built upon the strong nuclear force one would not have this
important property since neutrons and protons have similar masses so
neither are located with precision in nuclei and from the outside nuclei
appear fairly spherically symmetric. It appears that well-ordered
structures rely heavily on the small volume of B. The specific
application to DNA replicative fidelity was highlighted in..."
And then Barrow and Tipler quote another work...
"It might as well be that a whole set of perfectly reasonable S-matrices
exist for any choice of these mE(Mass of the electron)/mN(Mass of the
Neutron) parameters, all of them yielding rather weird, self-consistent
universes, all but one of them existing only in the sense of Plato. Our
universe would be determined by the fact that only the choice mN/mE=1837
guarentees that there are large chain molecules of the right size and
kinds to make biological phenomena possible. It could be for instance
that the slightest variation in these parameters would change critically
the size and lenth of the rings in the DNA helix as to invalidate its
typical way of replicating itself. In this sense we could say that
mN/mE=1837 just because we are here. Other universe do exist as well but
nobody is around to see them. I am describing this somewhat paradoxical
mechanism just in order to warn that we may expect quite exotic criteria
to come into play when fixing the fundamental constants." Regge, ATTI
DEL COVERGNO MENDELEEVIANO, Acad. del Sci. de Torino, p. 398.
Click here to return to AL'S COSMIC COMIC HOME PAGE or here for ANTHROPIC COINCIDENCES